Police Enlist Forensics Expert to Uncover Data; FBI Now Investigating His Background.

The Controversy Surrounding Mark Lanterman: A Deep Dive into Credentials and Investigations

In recent weeks, the credibility of Mark Lanterman, a prominent computer forensics and cybersecurity expert, has come under intense scrutiny. A videotaped deposition obtained by FOX 9 Investigators reveals Lanterman defending his educational background, claiming to have earned degrees from Upsala College, a now-defunct institution in New Jersey. However, the FBI is currently investigating the legitimacy of these claims, raising significant questions about Lanterman’s qualifications and the implications for his work with law enforcement agencies across Minnesota.

The Investigation Unfolds

The controversy began when the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office launched an investigation into Lanterman’s credentials. In a letter obtained by FOX 9, prosecutors announced that they would no longer rely on Lanterman’s expertise in ongoing cases due to their inability to verify his educational and employment history. This decision has prompted the office to alert attorneys involved in at least ten cases to assess the potential impact of Lanterman’s previous work and testimony.

As the investigation progressed, it was revealed that the FBI is also looking into the allegations against Lanterman, further complicating the situation. The scrutiny has raised alarms not only about Lanterman’s past but also about the integrity of the cases he has been involved in.

Lanterman’s Defense

Throughout the investigation, Lanterman has consistently defended his credentials. In a video statement, he remarked, “My work and background have been scrutinized countless times in an adversarial setting.” Despite his assertions, he has declined multiple interview requests from FOX 9 Investigators, opting instead to address the allegations during a deposition in a civil case in U.S. District Court in Florida.

During this deposition, Lanterman maintained that he earned both bachelor’s and master’s degrees in computer science from Upsala College in the late 1980s. However, he admitted that he no longer possesses his diplomas. When pressed on how others could verify his attendance, he simply stated, “Because I told you,” a response that has raised eyebrows among those questioning his credibility.

The Evidence Against Him

The attorneys questioning Lanterman in the deposition presented compelling evidence that casts doubt on his claims. They noted that his name does not appear in any Upsala College yearbooks or graduation programs from the time he claims to have attended. Furthermore, their attempts to obtain his transcripts have been unsuccessful, and Lanterman was unable to identify any classmates from his time at the college.

In a somewhat troubling admission, Lanterman explained his lack of connections by stating, “Well, I lived with my grandparents. I wasn’t close to many people, no.” This statement has only fueled skepticism about his educational background.

Support and Allegations

Despite the mounting evidence against him, the firm that employed Lanterman has publicly supported him, describing his testimony as straightforward and reliable. They assert that there is no evidence to suggest he falsified his credentials. However, the attorneys questioning Lanterman are seeking to have his testimony stricken from the record, alleging that he committed perjury by sticking to what they believe is a fabricated story regarding his college attendance and degrees.

Throughout the deposition, Lanterman remained defiant, asserting, “I am telling you that if I was going to fabricate a degree, I would have chosen a better school, not one that was shut down.” This statement highlights the complexity of the situation, as it raises further questions about his motivations and the validity of his claims.

A Troubling Backstory

Lanterman’s firm, Computer Forensic Services, has built a reputation by contracting with law enforcement agencies, including the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office, which has awarded contracts worth up to two million dollars. However, the sheriff’s office has since announced that it will no longer utilize Lanterman’s services, with their final contract set to expire later this year.

Lanterman has also been a sought-after expert for media outlets, often providing insights into complex criminal cases. Notably, he played a crucial role in the conviction of Stephen Allwine, who was found guilty of murdering his wife. However, Allwine is now challenging Lanterman’s credentials in a recent court filing, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing saga.

The Future of Lanterman’s Career

As the investigation continues, Lanterman appears to be stepping back from his career. He recently withdrew from a separate federal case where his credentials were challenged, citing his age and a desire to pass his business on to his children. “That time has arrived,” he stated in a letter to the judge, indicating a significant shift in his professional trajectory.

In a further sign of distancing, Lanterman’s photo and biography have been removed from his firm’s website, a decision made by his son, Sean Lanterman, to ensure that the firm’s reputation remains intact amid the ongoing controversy.

Conclusion

The questions surrounding Mark Lanterman’s educational background and professional integrity are far from resolved. As the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office reviews cases involving his testimony, the implications of this investigation could have lasting effects on the legal landscape in Minnesota. While Lanterman maintains that his credentials are legitimate, the evidence presented thus far raises significant doubts. As this story unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the critical importance of transparency and accountability in the fields of forensics and cybersecurity.