Protecting Our Children: The Case of E.L. and the Allegations Against Marty and La’Quetta Small

It is the solemn duty of adults to protect children, not to exploit them through harmful and hyper-negative verbal attacks. Children should never be used as pawns in any situation, especially in cases of alleged abuse. The ongoing child abuse case in Atlantic City, New Jersey, involving Marty and La’Quetta Small, highlights the disturbing reality of how children can be demonized in legal battles. Central to this case is a child known only as “E.L.,” who has faced unimaginable challenges while navigating the complexities of this tragic situation.

The Defense Strategy: Demonizing a Child

In the courtroom, the defense has resorted to portraying E.L. as a “juvenile delinquent.” This tactic is not just an attempt to shift blame; it is a reprehensible strategy that seeks to undermine the credibility of a child who has bravely come forward with evidence of abuse. Such name-calling does nothing to alter the substantial digital evidence that E.L. has gathered against Marty and La’Quetta Small. Instead, it serves to further victimize a child who is already in a vulnerable position.

Evidence Collected by E.L.

E.L. has played a crucial role in collecting evidence against the Smalls. Alongside J.S., the daughter of Marty and La’Quetta Small, E.L. documented instances of alleged abuse. During a phone call, E.L. was reportedly muted while J.S. sent text messages confirming that E.L. could hear the abuse occurring in real time. This evidence was presented in court, where E.L. testified about the harrowing experiences witnessed during these calls.

The Uncomfortable Testimony

During his testimony, E.L. faced an uncomfortable situation when questioned by La’Quetta Small’s attorney, Michael Schreiber, who had previously represented E.L. in another legal matter. This overlap raises questions about the appropriateness of Schreiber’s dual role and the potential conflicts of interest involved. The state of New Jersey is currently seeking to have Schreiber removed from the case, highlighting the complexities and ethical dilemmas that can arise in legal proceedings involving minors.

The Nature of the Allegations

E.L. has confirmed to the Atlantic County Prosecutor’s Office that J.S. was subjected to verbal, mental, and physical abuse by her parents. He recounted witnessing instances of her father, Marty Small, screaming at her and physically assaulting her, including choking. E.L. described J.S.’s clothing being ripped and her body marked with bruises following these incidents. These details are not just hearsay; they are documented in the Affidavit of Probable Cause filed by the Atlantic County Prosecutor’s Office.

The Broader Implications

The case of E.L. and the Smalls serves as a stark reminder of the responsibilities adults have toward children. It underscores the need for a legal system that prioritizes the well-being of minors over the interests of adults. Children should never be subjected to further trauma through the legal process, and their voices must be heard and respected.

Conclusion

As this case unfolds, it is crucial to remember that children like E.L. are not just witnesses; they are victims who deserve protection and support. The exploitation of children in legal battles is a grave injustice that must be addressed. Society must rally to ensure that children are safeguarded from harm and that their experiences are validated, rather than dismissed or twisted for adult agendas. In the end, it is our collective responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us, ensuring that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.